Scope and method

About this reference

This site examines a specific corner of internet media history: independent political animation made for browser playback during the first half of the 2000s, with Eric Blumrich’s documented works as a central case.

Abstract vector paths and translucent animation frames on a dark field

Independence

This reference is editorially independent. Eric Blumrich does not operate it, contribute to it or endorse it. The domain name makes that distinction especially important, so the full notice appears at the top of the homepage and in every page footer.

What is included

Public identifiers and historical context

The work records use a narrow set of documented facts: the title associated with a page, the year in which it is first documented, the 550 × 400 delivery frame, the SWF filename and language used by contemporary inbound links. Separate sections provide context about the election, war, law, technology or essay named by those links.

Technical essays explain the Flash toolchain, distribution networks, format retirement, emulation and solo production. Public authority pages are linked when they directly support a factual statement.

What is excluded

No work, no substitute, no personal extension

  • No animation, still frame, screenshot, executable, video, audio or media-file link.
  • No reader correspondence, personal column, first-person voice, contact route, commercial offer or biographical expansion.
  • No invented scene description, dialogue, soundtrack, sequence, ending, award, exhibition, client or credential.
  • No current personal account or successor site is named or linked.

Original illustrations on this reference use abstract technical motifs only. They are not depictions of the documented works and should not be read as visual evidence about them.

How uncertainty is shown

The gap stays visible

A bare Flash wrapper proves that a file was intended to play at a particular size; it does not prove what appeared on every frame. An inbound phrase proves how a linker labeled the destination; it does not prove that the label was accurate. A filename can help identify a work without revealing its contents.

Each work page therefore moves in a fixed order: documented record, contemporary link language, historical context, and limits of description. The order prevents context from silently becoming a claim about the animation.

Why keep the original page addresses?

Links are part of media history

The flat page names were the handles through which other sites referred to individual pieces. Keeping those addresses attached to careful reference pages preserves the meaning of old citations while avoiding republication. Media-file requests are directed only to an informational index, never to a substitute file.

Begin with the documented works index · Flash toolchain · distribution routes.

Citation practice

Links support only the sentence beside them

Public sources are used narrowly. Adobe supports dates and policy statements about Flash Player. Ruffle describes its own emulator. Government and institutional pages support legal, public-health, preservation and occupational-safety context. None is presented as a source about an unseen animation.

A current source may revise its page, so the prose avoids invented statistics and sweeping conclusions. When no verified authority is needed, a sentence remains uncited rather than receiving a plausible-looking address. The result favors a small source set with clear responsibilities.

This method also prevents a context source from implying endorsement. A court docket, health review or magazine page helps place a topic in history; it does not sponsor this reference or validate every political claim made around that topic.

Corrections follow the evidence layers

A technical correction should update a filename or date without silently rewriting the historical essay. A better public source can replace a contextual citation without changing the catalog record. If direct, rights-cleared study ever supplies new knowledge about a work, that knowledge should be identified as a new evidence class rather than blended into an old wrapper record.